Friday, November 4, 2011

{Vintage for Beginners} Dating Vintage Clothes

If you want to wear vintage clothing it's very helpful to be able to put a rough date on garments. Even if you don't intend to be a purist about things, it helps to know an item's approximate era in order to avoid being taken for a ride by unscrupulous or ignorant sellers and overpaying for something that's been misdescribed. Or perhaps you'll find yourself in a charity shop, clutching what you think just may be an original 1950s dress.

I have a quick checklist I work through whenever I spot an item I think might be vintage. None of these on its own will be enough to determine whether a garment is proper vintage, but looking at all together will help you to draw a reasonable conclusion. If you know your stuff there's a chance you might find a bargain that's been mis-labelled as later than it actually is by a seller mistaking the original for the revival.


Obviously, the first factor in dating a garment is the style. My Fashion Eras post gives a brief overview of 20th century styles. If you want to become something approaching an expert I can recommend getting a month's trial subscription to and settling down for a long session with their collection of historic Sears & Roebuck catalogues. Familiarising yourself with these will give you an appreciation of the finer details which can help more accurately date a garment.

Sleeve styles are quite distinctive to each era, and so can often be a telltale sign of original vs later copy - 80s-does-50s dresses often have puff shoulders and wide armholes, whereas original 50s designs generally have quite snug-fitting sleeve cuffs. On the other hand, don't automatically assume that a batwing sleeve sweater is 80s - Dolman sleeves were quite popular in the 50s.

Popular sleeve styles in the...
  • 1930s: Flutter / Butterfly; Cape; Puff shoulder (omitted in the diagram above); Set-in.
  • 1940s: Puff shoulder; Set-in (with or without small triangular shoulder pads); Cap; Kimono (late 40s).
  • 1950s: Bishop (a.k.a. Poet); Cap; Set-in; Raglan; Dolman; Puff; Kimono.
  • 1960s: Sleeveless; Set-in; Raglan; Cap; Bell (very late 60s).
  • 1970s: Angel; Butterfly; Cape; Bell; Leg-o-mutton (Victorian revival); Flounce / Ruffle.
(Note: These are just the dominant sleeve styles from each era, as a guide)

Look also at the length of the skirt - the timeline below briefly illustrates skirt styles and lengths from the 1930s to early 60s (I'll be discussing this in more detail when we come to the Building a Vintage Wardrobe series):

So a "1950s" dress with a skirt that finishes above the knee might be a square dance dress from the 1970s or later (likewise for froufrou petticoats); though it's possible it was designed for a teen or short lady.

Zippers & Closures

The second thing I look at is the style of zip. Plastic zips were uncommon before the 1970s, so if for example you're looking at a circle skirt, a metal zip will be a good sign that it's an original 1950s skirt, while a plastic zip can be an indicator of a later item. Plastic zips with cotton twill tapes are earlier than plastic zips with tapes made in that sort of polyester canvas you see now. Invisible zips were invented in the 1950s but only really became ubiquitous much later, around the late 80s / early 90s. Obviously it's not exactly unknown for an old garment to be given a replacement zip, or for a repro dress to be sewn (as I do) with a metal zip; so take this along with other factors in your assessment.

Another aspect to note is the placement of the zip; 30s and 40s dresses usually had the zip in the side seam (with a second short zip at the back of the neck, on high necklines), whereas from the late 50s onwards it became common to place the zip in the centre back. This can be a good thing to look at when trying to distinguish (for example) 70s-does-30s from the real deal.

If there is no zip, but a button or snap placket in the side seam of a dress, it's likely that it dates to pre-1950s. Again I stress this is not a hard and fast rule (I have a dress which I'm sure is late 50s or even early 60s, which has a snap placket in the side seam).


The label can be full of clues as to an item's age. American- and Canadian-made clothing often has a union label, which can help determine a date range. Clothing with the distinctive CC41 Utility label was produced during the period of fabric rationing, which ran from 1941 to (I think) 1951.

The style of the label itself can be an indicator: early-mid 20th century labels were usually woven, until around the 1960s printed satin labels started to become more common. The writing on the label is another clue: earlier labels often feature script fonts, while in the 60s and 70s modern, hippie-influenced fonts were frequently used. The Vintage Fashion Guild has an extensive collection of vintage brand labels, categorised alphabetically.

If there is a size label this can also help: vintage sizing was smaller than modern, so if it's marked a size 14 but is clearly tiny, chances are it's got some age to it. In British sizing, a size 14 in the 1940s was a 32" bust. By the late 1960s it was a 36" bust and remained so into the early 80s; it's now a 38" bust. If the label actually gives a "to fit bust" measurement, there's a good chance it's pre-1980s, as the practice of actually clarifying sizing seems to have died out around then.

Seam finishings

While the overlocker was actually invented a long time ago in the late 19th century, it was unusual for seam allowances to be serged or overlocked before the 1960s. Prior to that, the seams of commercial garments were often pinked. Of course, home-made garments right up to the present often have no seam finishings.

Seam allowances used to be generous, to allow for garments to be let out as necessary. Hems were also generous - often three or four inches deep - and finished with lightweight hem tape and blind-stitching. Modern mass-produced garments usually have a very narrow, machine-rolled hem.

Fabric and Print

If you followed my series on synthetic fabrics, you'll know that polyester wasn't invented until the 1950s, and was labelled under trade names like Dacron and Terylene until at least the 60s. So, anything labelled polyester is generally post 70s (you'd be amazed at how many sellers list polyester-labelled items as original 40s or 50s).

If there is no label, it's possible to determine fabric content using a burn test.

Prints can often be an indicator of age, once you get to know them. It's not something I have the space to cover in detail here, but it's something you can often follow your instincts on. If, for example, that "1950s" dress has a print of squiggles and triangles in primary colours, or a washy watercolour floral, there's a good chance it dates from the 80s.

In the end...

Whatever your conclusion regards the age of the item, you can now make an informed decision whether to go ahead and part with your cash. So that 1950s dress turns out to be 80s-does-50s? If you like it, don't let that stop you from buying it - just make sure you're paying a price appropriate for 80s vintage and not 50s vintage.

Next in the series: Building a Vintage Starter Wardrobe

The illustration at the top is from a vintage greetings card I got at a boot fair. If you borrow her, please credit me as the source.


  1. What a great post, and I couldn't argue more about your last point, at the end of the day if you like an item it doesn't matter which era it is from.

    I have only a handful of vintage items but have noticed how strong , well- finished and sturdy they feel compared to nowadays high-street items. I also like the fact that the tag always says "Made in Great-Britain"!!

  2. These posts are really helpful. Thank you!

  3. This is such an amazing post, the best I have read in a long time!! It was so helpful and I never knew the facts about zips and polyester! Thanks so much for your post. I'm new to your blog and I'm definitely following now! XxxX

  4. Another indicator is thread and wear (not through poor treatment, simply age). Pre 60s garments, I've found, have a slightly different feel to the threads of the stitching, especially on home made (which is often underpriced as age can't be proven).

  5. You are right about unscrupulous sellers. There is one on e bay at the moment, who shall remain nameless, but really, guys, nearly a hundred quid for H&M and Next garments, come on.

  6. This is such a thorough post! I feel that dating vintage is one of the most important things to learn if you're going to wear it. Dating vintage has helped me to shop more efficiently too. When there's a huge thrift store or private sale to rummage through, being able to quickly sweep through and pick out the goods makes a very pleasant shopping experience.

  7. A great post full of very helpful tips, thank you for posting!! X

  8. Great the post.. I Love garments history!

  9. Excellent post. I can't agree with you more about the quality of vintage clothing VS clothing we have today. Not fits better or feels better than vintage

  10. Bravo! Faboulous, fabulous post. I'm going to include this in a mid week link I often do called 'Mid week link love' hope you don't mind. x

  11. Very useful thanks Charlotte! Just going to check if it has got pinked seams!


I'd love to hear your thoughts!


Related Posts with Thumbnails